과거를 지키는 국가유산청의 현재, 빛과 그림자 사이의 명암 > K-wave Trends

Recently, the Korea Heritage Service's website came under fire due to a security loophole. It was belatedly revealed that an attachment posted last July, titled "Status of Cultural Heritage Sales Permits in 2024," had left the personal information of 909 cultural heritage dealers exposed without protection. This file contained not just names, but six categories of sensitive data, including residential addresses, mobile phone numbers, dates of birth, as well as business-related sales status and whether ledgers had been inspected. The file remained accessible to anyone for nearly a year until a victim filed a complaint, proving a serious flaw in the public agency's information management system.

The impact of this incident is too significant to be dismissed as a mere clerical error. The fact that the personal information of over 900 industry insiders was exposed for such a long period clearly shows how lax the verification process was during the information disclosure process. While the Korea Heritage Service belatedly acknowledged the complaint and took post-incident measures such as blocking file access and deleting the post, the anxiety over how the leaked information might have been misused remains with the victims. Even though public agencies should operate based on the trust of information subjects, the failure to uphold even the most basic security protocols is a painful point.

Meanwhile, in contrast, the Korea Heritage Service is showing signs of trying to offset its administrative shortcomings by announcing notable academic achievements. It has announced the designation of a 'deer antler harpoon tip embedded in a whale bone,' excavated from the Neolithic site in Hwangseong-dong, Ulsan, as a National Folklore Cultural Heritage. This artifact is a rare case discovered with the harpoon tip still embedded in the whale bone, holding immense academic value as direct evidence of hunting methods used by humans in the prehistoric Korean Peninsula. It is particularly significant as it clearly supports that the whaling records in the 'Petroglyphs of Bangudae,' a UNESCO World Heritage site, were not merely symbolic expressions but evidence of actual livelihood activities.

This proposed cultural heritage designation is also drawing significant attention from academia as it is the first instance of heritage related to prehistoric production and livelihood activities being pursued as a nationally designated cultural heritage. The Korea Heritage Service plans to finalize the designation through the Cultural Heritage Committee after a 30-day notice period to collect opinions from various sectors. At the same time, the agency continues its diplomatic efforts in the international community. Through an information meeting of the World Heritage Committee held in Paris, France, it is sharing the preparation status for the 48th UNESCO World Heritage Committee session to be held in Busan this July, focusing on promoting Korea's cultural capabilities to the world.

Ultimately, the perspective on the Korea Heritage Service is torn between two trajectories: 'administrative incompetence' and 'academic expertise.' For the agency's apology, which promised a full review of its internal management system and personal information protection training, to be more than just rhetoric, it must be accompanied by concrete and effective measures to prevent recurrence. Furthermore, it must not be forgotten that as much care as is put into excavating the past and proving its value, administrative meticulousness in protecting the personal information of citizens living in the present is an essential virtue that a state agency must possess.